Offender-Victim Distance and its Influence On Criminal Conduct: Towards A Theory Of Criminogenic Distancing
Keywords:
criminology; victimology; moral disengagement; dehumanization; empathyAbstract
This article proposes the concept of criminogenic distancing, referring to the physical and psychological distance between offenders and victims that facilitates criminal conduct by reducing empathy, weakening moral restraints, and diminishing awareness of the consequences of harmful actions. Drawing upon criminological theory, victimology, and social psychology, particularly the work of Stanley Milgram and Albert Bandura, the paper argues that distancing operates as a general criminogenic mechanism across diverse forms of offending, including interpersonal violence, genocide, white-collar crime, terrorism and cybercrime. Physical separation, dehumanization, stereotyping, and the diffusion of responsibility are examined as complementary mechanisms that increase the likelihood of offending. The article concludes by discussing the implications of the theory for victimology, crime prevention, and public perceptions of offences involving diffuse or indirect victims.
References
Bandura, A., 2016. Moral disengagement. New York: Worth Publishers
Gottfredson, M.R. & Hirschi, T. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Redwood: Stanford University Press Levin, J. & McDevitt, J. 1993. Hate Crimes. New York: Plenum Press
Măgureanu, A.F., 2025. Criminologie/Criminology. Bucharest: Universul Juridic
Milgram, S., 1974. Obedience to authority, an experimental view. New York: Harper & Row Publishing
Traverso, E., 2003. The Origins of Nazi Violence. New York: The New Press
von Hentig, H., 1967. The Criminal & His Victim. Connecticut: Archon Books
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alexandru Florin Măgureanu (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
