The Serial Killer, between Disgust, Public Opprobrium and Morbid Fascination
Keywords:
serial killer; definition; categories; morbid fascinationAbstract
Dividing serial killers into categories is an approximate operation. Even the definition of this type of criminal involves some controversies and is only possible by referring to some very general characteristics. The way these criminals are presented in the media, documentaries and books about true crimes contribute to the development of a morbid and partially inexplicable fascination with such bloody and brutal acts. Beyond the fact that such fascination says a lot about where we are as a society, it also represents an unforgivable contempt for the memory of the victims and those close to them. Most theories tend to regard the serial killer as a person suffering from various mental illnesses. Although such judgments are probably correct in most situations, in other cases they may be false and have no other basis than our desire for these brutal criminals to be different from the rest of society.
References
Alexandru Florin Măgureanu (2023), Between the Banality of Evil and the Monstrosity of the Criminal. Theories of the Alterity of the Criminal, The Criminal Sciences Journal of the “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Police Academy, no. 1/2023
Christopher Berry-Dee (2017), Talking with psychopaths and savages, John Blake Publishing
David Wilson (2019), My Life with Murderers, Sphere Publishing House
Dorothy Otnow Lewis (2001), Guilty of Dementia, Allfa Publishing House, Bucharest
James Alan Fox, Jack Levin (1994), Overkill, Mass Murder and Serial Killing Exposed, Ed. Springer, New York
John Douglas, Mark Olshaker (2017), Mindhunter, Penguin Random House Publishing, UK
Valerian Cioclei (2011), Criminology Handbook, C.H. Beck Publishing House, Bucharest
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alexandru Florin Măgureanu (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
